Why free speech should not only be tolerated, it should be encouraged

You can tell by the fact that the left and the right are always accusing each other of it, that the general public dislikes lying.  It's a bad thing.  That's not to say that all accusations of it are well founded (in fact a large percentage of these accusations are lies themselves), but rather, they are often useful in attempting to discredit one's opponent.

Why is lying bad anyway?  It's bad, because it can cause others who have accepted false information as fact, to make incorrect judgments based upon it, often to the detriment of themselves and anyone else who may be affected by such incorrect judgments.  A  simple example would be a mechanic charging a car owner for a brake inspection without even looking at the automobile.  The car owner then drives away along with his family, with complete confidence that everything is a okay, but they all end up sailing over the edge of a 200 foot cliff.

Wouldn't it be great if we could read minds?  That way, not only could we tell when people are lying, we could know what kind of person any individual really was, and thereby avoid anyone who consciously meant us harm.  What a great asset that would be.

Now, none of us can read minds, but we can do the next best thing.  We can infer what type of person any individual is simply by paying attention to what he says and does.  Chances are, you wouldn't your let children play in the yard of someone who openly declares he is a member of a satanic cult that practices child sacrifice.

The ability to make inferences is a tremendous asset, right up there with telepathy, so why on earth would anyone in favor of inhibiting it for anyone else?  

Well, you might be in favor of it if you were, uh, I don't know, a liar.  

Check out this post at I Own the World Report.  It makes several good points about a typical lying lefty, starting with her appearance.

This is an ugly, ugly woman, inside and out. Look at her byline pic –

Linda Stasi

Now look at her in reality –
Politifact just gave her a pants-on-fire rating for her photo alone.

Now the left is always saying that we shouldn't judge women on their appearance, so why is this fat, old, liberal chick, lying to everyone about how she looks?

No one wants to admit, or have other people know that they are ugly, so I going to cut her some slack on that one.  

What I am going to take issue with is her apparent stupidity and the fact that she gets paid for what I do for free.

In case you haven't read her article, she attempted to say that one of the victims in the San Bernardino shootings was hardly any better than one of the shooters who worked with him, since he was constantly spewing right wing hatred, which caused the shooter (who otherwise would have been a lifelong good and peaceful citizen) to boil over in rage.  

So much for the lefty mantra, "Don't blame the victim", and our ugly lefty chick goes one step further by trying to excuse the shooter, in spite of her lame attempt to say she is not doing so.

Beyond the hypocrisy and lies, the worst thing our fat, ugly, lefty, news writer does is to denigrate the right to free speech.  She writes:

"Thalasinos (the victim) was an anti-government, anti-Islam, pro-NRA, rabidly anti-Planned Parenthood kinda guy, who posted that it would be “Freaking Awesome” if hateful Ann Coulter was named head of Homeland Security. He asked, “IS 1. EVERY POLITICIAN IS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR? 2. EVERY POLITICIAN IS A MORON? 3. EVERY POLITICIAN IS RACIST AGAINST JEWS?” He also posted screeds like, “You can stick your Muslim Million Man march up your asses,” and how “Hashem” should blow up Iran.
His Facebook page warns that “Without HEALTHY PREGNANT WOMAN (Democrats) would have NO SOURCE of BABIES to SACRIFICE and SELL!”

We have freedom of speech but even so, a city worker should refrain from such public bigotry. Municipal workers have been fired for spewing and posting racial and sexual slurs".
Now obviously, she doesn't think that the victim was a nice guy, but how was she ever to come to that conclusion in the first place?  Because of what he said!  Duh!

Also, how was the shooter able to get away with orchestrating his attack?  By keeping quite about it!

You see, exercising free speech isn't just good for the speaker, it's good for anyone around who might listen, especially if the speaker means them harm.

It's much easier to identify and avoid the wrath of someone who telegraphs their intentions than someone who hides them.  This ain't rocket surgery!

OK, so why would our fat, ugly, leftist chick want to put everyone in danger by curtailing the right to free speech?

Come on, you know the answer.

'Cause lefties lie, and restricting free speech just makes it that much easier for them to make sure their lies never get exposed.

No comments:

Post a Comment