Shut up, Roll Call

I'm sick of you guys grasping at straws.

“If Trump wins the Republican nomination, something bad could happen!!!!”
                        - Roll Call

source: Elect Hillary Association, I mean, Roll Call

Donald Trump Could Swing the Senate | Opinion

Imagine, for a moment, the once unthinkable scenario that Washington Republicans are beginning to contemplate:  The GOP convention in Cleveland with Donald Trump as the nominee. 
After Melania Trump and the Trump kids get prime time spots to talk about how The Donald will make America great again, every Republican senator and Senate nominee will get a turn at the podium to talk about the Republican Party and its new leader, Donald Trump.
New Hampshire’s Sen. Kelly Ayotte describes the “beautiful wall” coming between the U.S. and Mexico. Sen. Rob Portman talks about waterboarding, which Trump has endorsed with a “you bet your ass I would!”  Sen. Ron Johnson defends the constitutionality of Trump’s call to surveil certain mosques, and Sen. Rand Paul reminisces about Trump making fun of his hair and height.
It’s not going to happen that way, of course. Every candidate except Portman, who represents Ohio, would find a “scheduling conflict” to avoid the awkwardness. But the prospect of otherwise strong swing-state Republicans having to get elected or re-elected with Donald Trump at the top of the GOP ticket becomes more real every day.
A Trump-topped ticket is a mouthwatering prospect for Democrats, especially when it comes to retaking control of the Senate. And if Hillary Clinton can win the presidency, which Democrats seem to believe a Trump nomination would almost guarantee, Democrats would only need to retake four seats, not five, to win control of the Senate.
Read more.  Don't bother.

“Yeah, and monkeys could fly out of my butt”
                         - Wayne Campbell

Trump bashers - They’ll do anything to try and scare people into voting for someone else, no matter how far fetched it may be, which proves they got nothing.

There’s something wrong here.  Supporting your party’s clear front runner seems like a no brainer, and I am extremely suspicious of anyone who doesn’t.
What’s the reason for all the anti-Trump rhetoric from the right?  Check out The Last Refuge.  Their explanation appears to be more complete and logical than anyone else’s.

I call it "spider sense"

I have nothing to go on but all the many articles that exist in which you have the same access as I.  That, and some type of instinct I have, that has been telling me for decades - PETA, the SPCA, the Humane Society, these groups have some ulterior motive other than the well-being of animals.

It's articles like this that arouse my suspicions:

source: The Daily Caller

PETA Gets Sued for Stealing, Then

Murdering, A Family Dog

A family is suing People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) for $9 million after two senior employees stole their pet Chihuahua Maya off their porch and had the dog killed.
The family captured video on their home surveillance system of two PETA employees, Victoria Carey and Jennifer Woods chasing Maya down, taking her off the family’s porch and shoving the dog into a white van. PETA admitted four months later it euthanized Maya later that day.

Read more:

I know it's only a few hours old

I know it's a pretty small sample (so far)
I assume it's a right wing site
I still think it's funny
Trump: 152  Hillary: 0

source:    Found at I Own The World Report

Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton

Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton?
Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton?

Classic Example

Check out what I saw at I OWN THE WORLD REPORT.

I guarantee you that Big Fur Hat does get it, he's just trying to make a point, and I'm going to explain it anyone who doesn't understand.

I'm sure all of you have run across similar leftist conundrums before:

  • The left claims that they are for working people, but they are in favor of almost everything that threatens jobs here in the U.S.
  • The left claims to want to help the poor, but is in favor of almost everything that raises the prices of the goods they buy.
  • The left claims to hate big money in politics, but has no problem with George Soros.
  • The left claims to want to help the poor and lower class of this country but is in favor of letting in hundreds of thousands of immigrants. These immigrants compete with our most disadvantaged citizens for jobs and they lower wages. They also put additional strain on welfare and other government assistance programs meant to aid poorer U.S. citizens.
If I spent more time thinking about it, I could make this list about two pages long, but you get the idea.

I remember, decades ago, wrestling with similar enigmas -  How could the left claim to be in favor of X, and simultaneously be in favor of Y, when the two were at odds with each other? 

Then, one day while listening to Rush Limbaugh, he explained it to me, and it all made perfect sense.  The problem I (along with so many other people) was having, is that I accepted what the left was saying at face value.  I made the mistake of thinking that the left could be honest about anything, including stating their true ambitions.

If you believe that the left is truly concerned about...

  • the poor
  • global warming/the environment
  • access to health care 
  • helping minorities
  • increasing public safety
  • jobs
  • fairness
  • anything else they claim to care about are just going to end up banging your head against the wall.

The leaders of the left care about only one thing-


I know that may seem a little harsh.  I understand that at first, it might be hard to accept, but think about it.  In order to understand the true motivation of the left, you need to find a common denominator for all things they claim to favor.  A template that fits and explains all of their positions at once.  None of the bullet points I listed just above, can explain why the left holds all the positions that it does, simultaneously. The only thing that can, is what is printed above in bold.

When you understand that, suddenly everything becomes so clear.  Everything fits.  It all makes sense.

So, of course, the left wants as many as many Muslims as possible to be imported into this country.  Islamists have publicly stated, many times, that their goal is to destroy it.

Understand this:  The left isn't simply just wrong.  

It is evil.

Uh, Louie, Louie, you're talking to people who are willing to wait in line for over a day to spend $200 on a pair of shoes.

 Calypso Louie: Just another liberal who thinks his suggestions are more powerful than the law of supply and demand.
source: weasel zippers

Farrakhan Starts Campaign To Get Fellow Blacks To “Boycott Christmas”…

Screen Shot 2015-11-26 at 4.00.00 PM
Bah hambug.
Via Nation of Islam’s Justice or Else:
The first call to action from the massive gathering on 10.10.15 is the nation-wide boycott of the holiday spending season beginning with Black Friday. During his Justice or Else address, Minister Farrakhan quoting Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “We have to find a way to redistribute the pain”.
We have to now withdraw our economic support, so that those who give us pain can receive some pain in return. “You’re either going to treat us right, or we’re going to withdraw from you our economic support. …We intend to boycott Christmas but not Jesus,” Minister Farrakhan said. “We choose not to spend dollars on Black Friday, Black Saturday, Black Sunday, Black Monday.  We are not going to spend our money for the rest of that year with those companies that we have traditionally spent our money on.”

 Yeah, Louie, these people are even wiling to kill for shoes.  They're not going to join in any boycott.
source: CBS News

Teen shot dead in alleged clash over Nike Air Jordans

Scene of shooting outside Dayton Mall in Dayton, Ohio on Friday, Dec. 20, 2014
CINCINNATI - Police were studying mall surveillance video in the fatal shooting of a 16-year-old Ohio boy who authorities say tried to steal a shopper's limited-edition Nike Air-Jordan athletic shoes.
Miami Township police said a man with a concealed weapon permit fired his gun after he and another man were accosted Saturday morning by three teens on a sidewalk outside the Dayton Mall. Police said one teen had showed a gun.
After the confrontation, Jawaad Jabbar of Middletown died of a gunshot wound to his torso, authorities said.
Read more.  It's not really necessary.

Why Does Anyone Listen to this Idiot?

source: The Guardian

Spike Lee: female students should go on sex strike to combat campus rape

Chi-Raq director says women withholding sex would help curb the ‘abundance’ of sexual assault and harassment at US colleges

The difference between him and Elton John is that Elton didn't wear goofy glasses and expect to be taken seriously.

Spike Lee has said a sex strike by women could help prevent sexual harassment on US college campuses.

“I think a sex strike could really work on college campuses where there’s an abundance of sexual harassment or date rapes,” Lee told Stephen Colbert on The Late Show on US television. “Second semester it’s going to happen. Once people coming back from Christmas and some stuff jumps off, there’s going to be sex strikes in universities and college campuses across this country.”

Read more.  DON'T - FUCKIN' BOTHER!

Spike Lee is an idiot, but all of you already knew that.  Spike, isn't that a dog's name?  Like Rover or Fido?

Now I could write several paragraphs devoted to explaining just how unqualified Lee is to comment on anything outside of his area of expertise, but it's just so much easier to sum it all up in one sentence.  He's a liberal.

For some reason, liberals think that if someone has some amount of knowledge in one field, he or she can automatically speak with credibility on others, particularly if that person is a liberal celebrity.

In their defense, it's darned hard to find a liberal whose knowledge is both broad and deep.  Having a liberal mindset requires ignoring or being unaware of most of the world around you.  In order to be a liberal, you must be either unable or unwilling to connect the dots.

Before we get too far along, I would like someone to explain to me how if this whole campus rape thing is such big problem, why, why, would anyone be in favor of letting in countless immigrants into this country when it's been proven that the rape crisis they bring long with them is worse than any problems we are experiencing on college campuses by several orders of magnitude.

Right here in the article above, Spike Lee demonstrates his complete lack of knowledge in the field of economics.  This is a common liberal shortfall that goes a long way in explaining why their policies so often fail.

Many people think economics is only about money, but it is really about human behavior.  If you don't understand it, won't be able to predict how people will act and react.  Spike doesn't understand economics (and many other things) and that is why his suggestion of a "sex strike" is not only doomed to fail, it would have negative unintended consequences if it showed even the least signs of succeeding.

OK, so Spike says Woof, woof, throw me the ball. Take me for a walk.  If college girls would stop being so slutty for a while, the campus rape problem would just go away.

OMG, where do I begin?  First, does Spike really think that him simply suggesting it, would cause college girls to not be so slutty?  They heard the suggestion many times before and still, they are like they are.  If Lee's suggestion could actually have some influence and produce his desired outcome, the problem would have never occurred in the first place.

Second, sex, like anything else, is a commodity, subject to the laws of supply and demand and decreasing the availability of will not decrease the demand of those who are willing to beak the law to get it, otherwise, the war on drugs would be over and won a long time ago.

Let's say you're some dude with strong sexual urges and some rapist tendencies.  If you are living in very free and open sexual environment.  You could probably go on indefinitely satisfying your urges without even breaking the law.  Now, let's say the environment changes, but you don't.  The supply of women willing to sleep with you dries up over night.  Your status of being a non-criminal can last only as long as you can fight your urges.

Third, weren't we already suggesting that college girls shouldn't be so slutty and college boys respect all women, right from the get go?  Oh yeah, that was called traditional morals, but liberals did away with them decades ago, and now it's causing problems that even liberals can recognize.  Go figure.

Liberals created this mess (and most other social problems we face today) by trashing and discarding the traditional values that allowed our society to function with the least amount of danger while maintaining the highest amount of freedom.  Liberals like Spike will attempt to solve the problem with ludicrous suggestions, by wearing ribbons, or by having 5K runs, none of which will do any good.  When those things fail, they will respond as they always do - by putting even more restrictions on everyone's freedom and spending more of our money, which by the way, won't do any good either.

The only thing that will actually effectively address the social problems we face today is a return to the values that kept them in check for hundreds of years, but it would take us a very long time to pull that off.  Especially since liberals would fight that with more vigor than social problems they are currently trying to solve.

Happy Thanksgiving...

Author's note:  Gotta go to Thanksgiving dinner.  No time to proofread.  I probably didn't make any mistakes anyway. (ha, ha!)

...oh yeah, and let the holiday wars begin.

Check out this news story and video.
'Cause, you know, 'cause some cop killed some guy.  Don't ya see the connection?

There's one thing you can say about today's protesters.  They make the '60's war protesters look reasonable and on focused on the subject by comparison.

You may not have been there yourself, pulling the lights off of this tree, but if you aren't actively spreading the word about what these (and other protesters like them) really are, you are at least partially at fault.

These protesters are pieces of shit and here's why:

OK, some cop kills some guy so now these idiots think it's a good idea to destroy Christmas decorations.  

Besides being totally unrelated to the issue in anyway, it proves that these people are lower in class, lower in intelligence, and lower in almost any positive attribute than anyone who came before them.

Believe it or not, we have had some national and international conflicts that were far more important than a few (maybe bad) cops shooting a few (definitely bad) guys, all without any people on either side resorting to destroying things meant to inspire people on either side with joy and goodwill.

The Civil War lasted from 1861 through 1865.  That time period includes four Christmas seasons, and never have I heard of either Yankees, Rebels, or any of their supporters destroying the other side's Christmas decorations, let alone destroying the decorations put in place by a party that had nothing to do with the conflict.

 The Chicago policeman, and police department may be guilty of wrongdoing, but I assure the Chicago Parks Department (or whatever agency is responsible for the city's holiday decorations) had nothing to do with any of this.

During 1914, the British and German soldiers proclaimed a Christmas day truce.

Think about that.  It was these men's jobs and responsibilities to kill each other, but even they realized that some ideas were of more importance than themselves or even what they were fighting for.

Compare the people that fought in and endured real conflicts in the past to today's protesters in Chicago and elsewhere.  The people living through WWII and earlier conflicts had real reasons to fear and hate their enemies.  Their lives, countries, and way of life were on the line.  Most of the people involved in today's protests are not directly involved (if they are law abiding citizens) in and don't even care about what they claim to be protesting.  

  The followers care only about themselves, by satisfying whatever primordial urge that vandalism satisfies. A lady in the accompanying video says "I just want the unnecessary killing to stop."  If that were true, why isn't she out protesting everyday over the murders that occur in the city each day?  No, it's only important to her when there's a big crowd out to cause trouble. 

The leaders care only about destroying our country and American culture as we know it, and that's the whole reason for the liberal attacks on Columbus Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas, and other American institutions.

What can you do about it?  Start calling the vandals what they really are.  They have no excuses for what they do.  They are pieces of shit.

Was all this a little too serious for you on a day when you want to just relax and enjoy yourself?  Check out this blast from the past. 

Now I'm only going to show this to you once.

That title is the punchline to the old joke:  "What did the suicide bomber instructor say to his class?"  Well, guess what?  It really happened.  

Imagine how much more trouble we'd all be in right now if radical Muslims weren't stupid.

source: The US Patriot

Islamic Suicide Bomber Trainer Accidentally Blows Up His Entire Class

In Baghdad, a terrorist who was in the middle of conducting a training for future militants, accidentally blew up an entire class, killing 21 of his students, and himself. The group was part of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, the terror group that has been participating in a string of attacks in the United States.

The incident may be viewed as a metaphor for the many lives lost in the wake of foreign and domestic terrorists’ relentless attempts to convert the nation into an extreme-religious state. In this turn of events, it appears that many innocent lives may have actually been spared. In fact, in one recent attack alone, 7 innocent people were killed.

According to recent reports, it was rumored that the instructor was in the process of showing his students how to use a suicide belt. As he was teaching, the live suicide belt actually detonated, resulting in mass fatalities.

Beyond the Trump Victory

Donald will win the 2016 presidential election for two reasons.

1)  Each time Muslim terrorists strike, thousands of Americans consider that to be the last straw, the deal breaker, on unchecked immigration, both legal and illegal, and it's a safe bet that there will be plenty of terrorist attacks between now and the election.

2)  Trump went about choosing his positions on issues differently than most candidates do.  Instead of immediately siding with his party on which issues to run and what position to take, Trump figured out what was important to the American people and took their side.  While this may have made some question his conviction on certain issues, it has made him practacally invincible.

His careful choice of issues has pushed other issues (issues where Trump may not have been seen to be as strong on) off the table, and now we are only talking about issues in which he scores very well.  This time around, we're talking about terrorism, immigration and the economy.  People are starting to realize that in today's world, abortion and paid family medical leave are at best, secondary issues.  There is a good chance that Romney would have won if this was the case in 2012.

Rival candidates have two choices.  Agree with Trump and look like they're late for the party, or disagree with Trump and look foolish.  Voters are left with three choices.  Trump, Trump light, or just plain wrong.

Trump wants to end illegal immigration and build a wall.  If you are some candidate other than Trump, what are you going to say?

- I'm in favor of unchecked illegal immigration.
- I favor some amount of illegal immigration.
- I oppose building a wall.
- I'm in favor of a smaller, shorter wall.
- I agree with Trump completely.

The first four positions would make you look ridiculous.  The last one gives no one any reason to vote for you over Trump.

I could be wrong (I've been wrong before), but with every passing day, it looks more and more obvious to me that that Trump will be the next president of the United States.

Although it is not yet a foregone conclusion, I think Trump supporters should start looking forward to the time after he wins the White House.  If you think his detractors are nasty now, you ain't seen nothing yet.  It's going to be like George Bush times ten.  The press will be out to get him more than they were after Nixon during the height of the Watergate scandal.  If you are a Trump supporter, understand that he is going to in need of your support much more after he wins than he did during the election.  

If Trump has made any mistake in his candidacy so far, I think it could be promising too much, too fast.  I surely hope I'm wrong. 
I hope that Trump can secure a few major victories within the first few months of being in office.  I think his whole presidency will depend upon that.


Ready to Rock

Spent Friday getting trucks ready for snowplowing just in the nick of time.  We must have gotten about a foot here and I'm already done with the first round.  Probably going to have go out again when it's all over.

I love snow.

This is Priceless - Sensible Muslim Control

I came across this exchange while reading the comments on a Rolling Stone article.  Apparently, the liberal, Apple Scruffs is too stupid to pick up on Jesus' satire.  Here's a link to the article.  It's less than a day old, so maybe some more great stuff will be added.